Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 71% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
According to: Raising minimum driving age is modest statement. By: By JOHN M. CRISP, Opponents will argue that some 16-year-old drivers are more competent than others at, say, age 30. Perhaps, but law can't easily deal with those kinds of distinctions.
They say that the minimal driving age should stay at 16 but I say that it should be changed to 18. I think this because Nudging the legal driving age upwards a bit, that is, in the direction of more maturity, experience, and responsibility, would at least have the practical effect of reducing the number of 16-year-olds who are killed each year in auto accidents. Therefore, I think that the minimal driving age should be changed to 18.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |