In New Jersey, they allowed teens to drive at 17. Studies have shown that the rate of teens killed in crashes in New Jersey has been lower after the driving age was too lowered.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/09/teen-driving-age-should-b n125010.html

Parents will have to drive students around more, but they will realise that it is so that their kids won’t die and think differently about it. Also, they must remember when they were younger and the same things happened to their classmates when they were starting to drive.

It sort of is, though, because it is a hunk of metal like a gun is and they can kill people with it without trying.

These are exactly the same documents that you were given. Looking on them would have given you more counter claims.

If they understand that they have not been allowed the opportunity, they should realize that and if they don't, then they should raise the driving age again.

If teens aren’t allowed to drink or smoke, then why do they have the responsibility to drive a car? With a car, they can kill other people and themselves. They can cause a lot of damage to the road, or things along it too.

Some might say that the deaths will then be moved up to age 18 but that wouldn’t be true because they will realize that if the age has been raised once for bad actions, then it can be raised again and they will pay more attention on the road.

Some might say that the deaths will then be moved up to age 18 but that wouldn’t be true because they will realize that if the age has been raised once for bad actions, then it can be raised again and they will pay more attention on the road.

In 2005, four teenage boys were in a car accident where it spun out of control. Two of the four teens died after hitting multiple objects. The driver survived.

Each year, about one-third of deaths of teens are due to teens that are just starting to drive. This would decrease if the driving age was raised. I found this on the documents that Mrs. Hagmann provided.