Buses cost money, so I agree because if you need buses to transport kids, you need the money for the gas.

And if you aren't experienced then you have a greater crashing chance

I agree because if you don't practice, THEN you have a greater chance of crashing, but if you begin at 16, you have more time to learn before you become an adult

I think Amanda is right because no 1 person can get more experienced if they don't start sometime

they can't be more experienced if they never learn how to drive

I disagree with Claire because 18 year olds have homework and go to college which would probably have more homework than highschool

Yes, but a bus takes more gas, and gas cost more money for a bus than a car. Also, you would have to spend money on gas more often because the bus is driving more places than a car, which is just going one way.

I disagree with Amanda because the teens aren't going to get any more experienced when they never learned to drive, so you might as well start early so they can have more knowledge of driving for the future.

I disagree with Claire because there are other means of getting homework done like in a lunch lab or extra studying time to get work done.

I agree with Paige because you can save money if you don't need as many buses to transport kids for an extra 2 years, therefore saving money for the school to support technological use.

They say that the driving age should be raised to 18, but I say that it shouldn't be raised because of education. If a kid is in high school, and doesn't have a ride to or from school, they can drive to school. Also, kids aren't going to get any more experienced if they learn how to drive when they're 16 rather than when they're 18. Therefore, I think the driving age should stay at 16.